Advisory Committee Meeting for MET/EGT Programs
MINUTES
York
Technical College
Federal Credit Union Conference Room
February 6, 2003
6:00-8:00 PM
Officers Present:
Bruce Hickman
Mike Huntley
Steve Padgett
Kathy Neal
Karl Strieby
Mohammad Hossain
After welcoming the members Mr. Hossain requested everyone to go through the minutes of June 5, 2002, and requested a motion for approval. Minutes were unanimously approved without any changes.
Mr. Hossain turned the floor to committee chair Mr. Hickman. Mr. Hickman called the meeting to order at 6:10 pm and opened the floor for discussion of the ABET issues. Mr. Hossain informed the committee that the ABET visit for accreditation is due in Fall 2003. Currently Mr. Hossain is in the process of finishing the ABET self-study report, which must be submitted before May 2003.
The
next issue discussed was the ABET assessment tools for program outcomes and
objectives. Mr. Hossain mentioned
that there are about twelve different tools that ABET recommends for assessment
of the program outcomes and objectives. Assessment
of the program outcomes and objectives through student survey is one of the key
elements of any curriculum. Mr.
Hossain asked members’ opinions on how to best conduct such survey which
generates the maximum number of responses.
Since ABET strongly recommends use of triangulation of the results, according Mr. Hossain, outcomes and objectives of the MET and EGT programs will be assessed through the following ABET approved methods:
Student survey
Employer survey
Focus group interview
Mr. Strieby will conduct the survey for ABET report. After discussion committee decided that survey will be placed on-line. The graduate and the employer will receive a letter in the regular mail asking them to participate in the on-line survey. A web address and password will be provided in the letter for access to the web site. Mr. Hossain asked Mr. Strieby to coordinate this activity with Mr. Chad Hyatt of the Education Technology Center. The focus group interview of program graduates was conducted by Mr. Susan Sherlock.
The
Outcomes and Objectives for both EGT and MET were discussed and
those
were checked against the existing ABET criteria consistent with the current
business and industry processes. Ms. Neal, Mr. Hickman and Mr. Huntley made
suggestions to change the composition and combine certain program objectives and
outcomes.
Mr.
Hossain asked members opinion as to how our graduates are meeting their
expectations and if they needed any additional training at work.
Mr. Huntley reported that our graduates are proficient at their work.
However, most of them needed additional training in the areas of project
reports and public speaking. Mr.
Hickman stressed the importance of knowing and utilizing the basic engineering
principles. He reiterated that
graduates must have the skills to use manufacturer’s catalogs and professional
handbooks. He reported that our
graduates are very eager to learn and they continue to improve in their work
through education, training and seminars.
Mr.
Huntley and Mr. Hickman reported that they continue to hire York Tech graduates
and co-ops whenever an opportunity becomes available. Members informed that
employers are willing to provide opportunity to further the educational goals of
the York Tech graduates and back-to-industry training for the faculty during the
summer term with the financial help from the college.
The committee members agreed that this effort would add more to the
experience of the faculty and they can bring the latest information from work
place to the classroom.
Mr. Hossain reported that the enrollment in the MET and EGT program for the spring semester remained flat and in many cases it has gone down. He asked members assistance in boosting the student recruitment by extending opportunities in the industries in the form of coop and internships.
Members discussed the various instructional delivery modes. Ms. Kathy Neal reported that college-wide there is 50% withdrawal rate from the online courses. Members agreed that online courses demand extreme discipline from the student. Mr. Hossain reported that there is a significant drop in Tech-on-line courses throughout the technical college system in South Carolina.
Several of the committee members suggested that our students learn to use softwares early in their program and become proficient users by the time they graduate. This would allow them to combine images from two to more softwares into one. When on the job our graduates are expected to use MS Word, Excel, Access and FrontPage and, be familiar with the use of the document scanners. Also, they are expected to handle PDF files and Adobe software with ease.
Mr.
Strieby reported that EXCELS (EXcellence Through College Enrollment
for LearnerS) is proving to be a good recruiting tool for MET and
EGT freshmen students. Many
schools in the area are participating in this effort and students are earning
dual credits for college. In the
future EXCELS will be expanded and this will replace another recruiting tool
used previously known as TAP (Technical Advance Placement). All
members assured that they would support any effort by the faculty or the college
to any back-to-industry training placement at their company.
Members mentioned that co-op placement is a good way to get they student
to know better and hire them in the future when they graduate.
Mr.
Hossain asked the committee member to perform their self-evaluation and
effectiveness as a committee for progressing the MET and EGT curricula outcomes
and objectives into the future. He
thanked everyone for the time they took out of their busy schedule to attend the
meeting.
Mr. Bruce Hickman, Chairman of the committee thanked everyone for attending and the meeting was adjourned at 7:45 PM.
Respectfully submitted,
Mohammad Hossain
Department Manager
MET/EGT Programs
|
“Must” conditions: |
Yes |
No |
Does the credit
degree program/cluster designed for immediate employment of graduates have
an advisory committee?
|
√ |
|
|
Does the college have
an Advisory Council Manual that includes purpose and procedures for
operation of advisory committees and the duties and responsibilities of
its members? |
√ |
|
|
Standards |
Yes |
No |
|
1.
Did the advisory committee meet at least two times this year
(excluding virtual meetings and polling)?
If not, indicate how many times the advisory committee met. _________ |
Red High- lights |
|
|
2.
Did the advisory committee provide input to help in reviewing and
revising programs for currency with business and industry processes as
appropriate? |
OrangeHigh-lights |
|
|
3.
Did the advisory committee review and make recommendations on the
utilization/integration of current technology and equipment in existing
programs? |
Green high-lights |
|
|
4.
Did the advisory committee assist in providing professional
development opportunities, field placements, and/or cooperative work
experiences for students and/or faculty within their company? |
Lime high-lights |
|
|
5.
Did the advisory committee provide assistance with student
recruitment, student job placement and, if appropriate, faculty
recruitment? |
Violet high-lights |
|
|
6.
Did the advisory committee complete a self-evaluation of the
effectiveness of the advisory committee in its defined role to the
institution? |
Blue high-lights |
|
|
7. Were
advisory committee outcomes and recommendations documented in minutes? |
√ |
|